But in this seller's market, I think its a way to lose everything.2) Most investors that I work with are high net worth and able to cashflow income minus expenses over $30k a year and have over 50K of liquidity on hand.

Although right now I am really hungry to enter into an endeavor and grow my finances and feel bad about the money I have save just sitting doing nothing, I’d rather atleast hold onto money than to lose it.

Well not including the dollar or two of lose change laying around. 

Investors are losing control of their personal property as government decides what you can and cannot do with it.

There is also a Portsmouth law firm who sued PRHA when they broke protocol and hired a non-federally vetted attorney to represent them in a lawsuit that resulted in a huge HUD audit and the PRHA director for 40 some years losing his job. 

We tried looking into buying out the other members but the percentages were so high that she would end up losing the house anyway from the monthly fees.I am not sure how to proceed as I've mostly just dealt with simple turn-key properties or simple lending. 

I've set my sights on single family.Thank you so much for your time.

However, if you sign a buyer's broker agreement that guarantees that the buyer agent is paid commission, and that buyers agent loses the procuring cause fight, you could potentially be on the hook to pay the buyer's agent, so clarify that up front.As to the lack of disclosures, that's a risk, but one that you can mitigate with a home inspection. 

The courts will look at how much you have to lose and $1000 is tiny, maybe not worth paying a lawyer.  

You can't lose either way, (selling or holding) as you are not negative cash flow and price appreciation is still trending upward.