As said before, the property is 100 years old, and certificates of occupancy are never used on properties of that age so I'm confused as to why now it's what they are using to contest the occupancy?

@Randy HamricMight not be the answer you're looking for, but personally if I had $135k to put into real estate at your age, I wouldn't quit my job right away.

Due to his age, he is not interested in seller financing (due to the 15 year term) He is happy to help me in any way, and I plan on asking him to do a lease option on a couple houses.If I can structure it to where I net $100-200 a month, and have the option to buy in 1-3 years, that would be great for me.

Due to his age, he is not interested in seller financing (due to the 15 year term) He is happy to help me in any way, and I plan on asking him to do a lease option on a couple houses.If I can structure it to where I net $100-200 a month, and have the option to buy in 1-3 years, that would be great for me.

The issue has to do with the age of the park.  

Age: within 15-20% of the same age as your subject property.Neighborhood: Comparables should be within the same neighborhood.

My father is getting up in age and I am calculating investments from this point forward with the idea that I will have money from my inheritance to work with.

Age, condition, and type of mechanicals.  

Now my kids have their own IUL  , locked in their insurability plus putting the power of compound to work for them at age 6 and 7.

Age of the park.