After all the nonsense private lenders dealt the past 5-7 years with second position and being cut out of their money on the shortsale....this security makes them much more comfortable.

How about management, advertising, entity maintenance, insurance, evictions, setouts, legal fees, damage done by tenants (in excess of the security deposit), lawsuits, utilities (at least during vacancies), capital expenses (not technically an operating expense), etc, etc, etc?

That woman is on social security, on section 8, and uses food stamps.

A 5% return PER MONTH is pretty decent and if the only thing you are worried about is PV (i.e. your investment is secured somehow) I wouldn't move it at all...

(See my recent post about this).The Background on the Active Real Estate Exception:Rental real estate, in many cases, is held to provide financial security to individuals with moderate incomes.

In my opinion, REAs should stay out of short sales except to list the properties and secure end buyers.

Anyone with earned income (or an existing IRA) can open a self-directed IRA (SDI) and invest in real estate, loans secured by RE, business ventures, and many other vehicles.

Then, the investor gets back the money plus 40%.I see no security for this this loan at all.

Section 203(k) insured loans save borrowers time and money, and also protect lenders by allowing them to have the loan insured even before the condition and value of the property may offer adequate security.

What software do you use for the videos?