Do your tenants object?

Ugh...sorry about that.What could they possibly have to object to the the TAR contract?

In fact, if CF is the primary objective with disregard to equity retention or appreciation, this style of investing may be the most lucrative.As to why several houses are safer than one – Multiple Revenue Streams.

In aggregate one could argue the effects are positive (and for which it's likely on objective answer really exists - it kind of depends on your political and social philosophy), but at the micro level you get a lot of the winners and losers, and where your position as a winner or loser is dictated more by specific sets of circumstances rather than your "role" as say a property owner, landlord, tenant, forclosee, etc.If you're not paying your mortgage and you happened to have gotten it through Chase which securitized it and it's subsequently been resold multiple times and now no one can get to all the right paperwork to foreclose on you, you win!

Three other individuals have since asked me to consult with them with the object of raising capital.

Without a crystal-clear understanding of your investment objectives (size, scope, term, return, etc.), you will never be able to make an informed decision about which market(s) to invest in.

I find myself getting shiny object syndrome and wanted to go after every new idea I read in a blog post or see on the podcast. 

I would like to share my opinion on why I perceive it to be impractical, but I'd first like to hear from your objective point of view.Thanks.

Let me know if I can assist in any way with your objectives.

It all depends on your investment objective & on your short term or long term goals.