yeah i think that sounds great, to prevent more confusion at the title company but im leaning towards a decision to require earnest money, but he hasnt even seen the house in person yet and i dont want to come off as too aggressive (especially if im a co-wholesaler) "addresses aren't disclosed until confirmation of deal has been presented" is a rough draft of what ill reply with, is that ok?

I'm just a bit confused on how the purchase would work of a SFR from the company itself? 

@JK I did read the forum start-up page but I am still confused.

I guess I'm just a little confused as to what would constitute a good deal for you.

The title company may get confused and throw up a roadblock since paying a commission to an unlicensed 'agent' would be frowned upon.They can put your "assignment consideration" or "assignment fee" as a 1 liner on the HUD-1 (line 215, not on the second page).

I'm confused.

I have gotten to page 30, and I was a little confused on the 20 year plan Nickerson laid out in the beginning.

Favorable tax treatment for selling personal residence (IRS Code Section 121) not to be confused with Section 1031 which does not apply to personal residences.Tie score automatic OT

The way you present the problem is a bit confusing to me.

Drew, to eliminate confusion-refer to the owner as the investor, not homeowner, as you said this is Not owner occupied.