Use the search feature (magnifying glass, upper right) and search for "tenant occupied property" or "tenant occupied rental" to find a ton of discussions.You need to know what you are doing.

Over the past year, I've had to make frequent calls and send numerous emails—sometimes daily to MNPMC's office and the managing partner to receive timely owner disbursements.

Our goal is to start with a few small multiunit rental properties and grow from there (thanks @Brandon Turner for the numerous resources in this realm!)

Two credit cards we're used and numerous memberships signed up for during that period of time.

One of the key features of the FHA loan was the Self-Sufficiency Test, which helped keep prices in check.

The property features two 1,400 sq ft suites on the main level (one currently leased) and over 3,000 sq ft on the upper level, with 750 sq ft already occupied, 3 small office spaces (+/- 250 sq ft each), and a basement tenant with 1,400 sq ft of storage space.The building generates $6,000 in monthly gross income from its five tenants, but with full occupancy and market-rate rents, it has the potential to bring in $10,000+ per month.Given its historical significance, stunning architectural details, and location, I’m curious about your opinion: Would this property be more marketable for sale with or without the current tenants?

The landlord may be planning on making it their 2nd home or any of numerous possibilities that the government removes with any law that changes that.  

I went to the U of L and have numerous properties in Southern AB. 

I won't mention the names but on IG there numerous coaches/mentors.

(the dot feature does not appear to work on my browser, I'm sorry for the multiple posting before)