data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/080e7/080e7cf23a949c3092ef9b6be915ceb47e7de740" alt=""
1 October 2007 | 8 replies
Maybe you are not doing something correct if you find it is still as hard now as it was when you did your first deal.The biggest reason it is easier is something MikeOH talks about.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3cc3/f3cc307bd74c5eb1df5896bc2600b6c509483cc3" alt=""
23 September 2007 | 4 replies
You are correct, big profits are made from big changes in the market, and certainly SFH's can be part of those big profits if done properly.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70e8c/70e8c1aca2bd3eac0b314e2c6390e9ea1b3c0fa5" alt=""
26 September 2007 | 8 replies
So, if the bank doesn't correct the tax deficiency by Monday morning and the property is sold for the back taxes, does the first mortgage that got foreclosed on still exist?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f23/09f238025d9850e4820a7b98caae7b7c1c74d016" alt=""
18 December 2007 | 4 replies
I thought the HUD1 was done at actual time of closing from the Title Company.Can someone explain the correct procedure and how it works?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f26c9/f26c9e7fdfe4faa6ef04d85d733ac299d44d88ca" alt=""
17 September 2007 | 6 replies
I believe in buying under market and letting the market correct itself while someone else is paying my mortgage (renter).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76abb/76abb283bbedf3428b32077421f790ed3b52bb68" alt=""
30 December 2010 | 5 replies
If you do, people will tell you and you can correct the issue.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbaa3/cbaa334ff257b4d7b9db775c2f2c3233402a2145" alt=""
21 September 2007 | 7 replies
The easiest way to look at it is to trade equal or up in value and reinvest 100% of your cash equity, and the difference will be the correct amount of new debt to put on your like-kind replacement properties.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c65f7/c65f7f151684a66f50c6b1d5776eb03eace7252a" alt=""
17 September 2007 | 4 replies
That seem to be reasonable and correct.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a1ec/3a1ecbb9a643e3fd833594eadedad2e5502f5129" alt=""
18 September 2007 | 2 replies
You might get some tax savings if you correctly declare the income and the expenses.John Corey
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16168/16168cb975dea428bcd66ed7ef4f633c61501124" alt=""
24 September 2007 | 5 replies
More correctly the estate pays the tax.