If could paraphrase to ensure I understand, do these 2 statements sound correct?

There is a lot of information out there it seems, if you know how to interpret it correctly (which I may not be).  

And you must be managing the place, correct?

Also, not sure if I posted this in the correct area but hope so.

Thanks for the correction.  

There are ALWAYS better deals (without foundation issues).See the thing is I think (but double check this) that a seller is obligated to disclose when selling that there were foundation issues (is this correct?).

Personally, I have good credit, but if the LLC is new, the bank don't look at your credit (pls correct me if I am wrong); and therefore will not lend me money.Is buying under your personal name and quitclaiming to the LLC the only way? 

Please correct me if I’m wrong, so the idea is to gain experience and knowledge from this paid walk with GC so we get the ballpark numbers and make offers in future without having to involve a GC anymore in the analysis.At what point in the process do you officially have your GC involved?

And that's a dangerous recipe.Am I correct that your company and building will be sold to the same purchaser? 

man, these clickbait titles, tho... that blanket statement doesn't work every time, you are correct. i ran some numbers on a home with a purchase price of $145k (mls, so the price is obv high(er)) that needed about $35k in repairs to make it nice for an arv of $225k (conservative). profit came out to be about $15k (after closing, carrying, etc.). roughly 20% return on cash outlays (dp, cc, repairs). rent would've been about $1700/mo on this one. refing it @75% would leave me 20k in the deal with about $200/mo CF.