If it just has regular outstanding amounts such as a few months of back taxes and utilities, you should just pay the relevant authority. 

It may or may not be relevant for a wholesale deal.Assuming your numbers are correct this seller doesn't look at all motivated to me.

...owner occupancy.This is from [page 68 of their 353 page study](https://sparq.stanford.edu/opd-reports) which was about something non-real estate related.They were studying something off-topic for this discussion forum, but something found in the data is quite relevant to us.What was being measured here is the frequency of traffic stops in census tracts.

Go to a library or bookstore and find relevant books.

What IS relevant is providing false information to the bank for the purpose of getting a loan.

Mike- Although you may know her, it should not have any relevancy unless your related.

(Fortunately for you, the dual agent may also not disclose to the seller that you are willing to pay more than you have offered for the property unless you consent to this disclosure.)In some cases a dual agent who is receiving both the buyer’s and seller’s agency commission may be over-incentivized to close the deal no matter what it takes.This could create ethical (and legal) issues where an agent may be tempted to not disclose a relevant fact for fear of ruining the deal, and losing out on a large, double commission.

It's a waste of time to negotiate back and forth over something that the relevant commercial lender might not even be willing to go for. 

hello @Curtis Harvey I try and be active as much as I can here on the forums and pitch in my input on relevant topics 

You could put it in a trust, capital gains is only relevant if you come to sell it.