data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5286e/5286eaee57bf3e3f55eb5428573c9c03b01f4df9" alt=""
5 December 2013 | 11 replies
Jurisdiction still lies with the same court that granted it.Just so you know the court cannot order the lender to remove your name as they are not a party, if your ex wife cannot refinance because of bad credit, the court only has 2 options, hold her in contempt for not removing you, or ordering the property sold to satisfy the mortgage.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5e6c/e5e6c2a02e5eef3fd98de9abe4cfc59337cf415d" alt=""
20 November 2013 | 1 reply
I have been told you could be stuck w/ more than one property, so it could be risky, but you can cancel any contract, at any point prior to it being signed by the other party.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45e58/45e583b302da94812be51f1d9e0c0c6a3e71a55a" alt=""
22 November 2013 | 9 replies
Legally the Trustee will become the party who controls the asset and usually moves to work with the Mortgagee to satisfy the lien through disposition.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70097/70097024278a5de74e8833dc50b2b80ac02defbd" alt=""
21 November 2013 | 9 replies
If you are seeking one on one, it must be in my opinion financially rewarding for both parties.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc554/bc554be6762154345e093e872d8af058aa1442f8" alt=""
26 November 2013 | 12 replies
It appears to be double payout but it is two different parties with different insurance interests in the property.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38810/38810ab5c67de5401fa2bcc66c9307910acb03b5" alt=""
27 November 2013 | 19 replies
Two things usually help in order to pull this off: 1) All parties need to know that you're wholesaling (not mandatory but it helps). 2) A good relationship with a buyer ready and waiting in the wings.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0ca4/a0ca4be3baa32825d264b547444d14baebe8ec63" alt=""
22 November 2013 | 2 replies
The second part is going to stay here because in our contract we said that person is obligated to repay us or obligated to make a loan.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e58b/1e58b270e905c6743ecd22a6b23447d9f6fa4048" alt=""
22 November 2013 | 5 replies
I was planning on doing all of the legal work to save him the expense and show good faith on my part. I
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/faab4/faab4d7de1906dc9b0d17c0b3f7a7f072373bca1" alt=""
24 November 2013 | 4 replies
This depends on the areas and structures each party (association or owner) needs to insure.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d564c/d564cf158d0738d488970988e6e2ca3eaf1d01e0" alt=""
2 December 2013 | 18 replies
Lets examine the first part is there a criteria for a seller?