
15 January 2011 | 4 replies
I think they have access to better info than that.They may use the inflated numbers in their public statements to make their point to the public which can be misleading but I am sure they have access to the real numbers.

5 February 2011 | 29 replies
I think it depends on what you're using the financial statements for.
2 February 2011 | 23 replies
While I agree with Bryan about making absolute blanket statements like that, John, I do know that there are many flippers who do a crap job and hide it well for unsuspecting buyers.

4 April 2011 | 15 replies
Even then, there are a few exceptions.Not sure how you intended that statement.

25 January 2011 | 9 replies
Almost all short sales are going to have statements from the lender who's taking the short saying the sellers must receive no benefit from the deal.

26 January 2011 | 21 replies
You would show POF by including a letter from the lender approving you for the loan and perhaps a bank statement showing the money in the bank.

25 January 2011 | 13 replies
Just as a note, AZ and CA deficiencies laws are very similar (per a statement from my attorney in AZ).

30 January 2011 | 8 replies
The way you phrase your statements sounds like you're letting your personal preferences and taste guide you, and that's dangerous to your wallet.