Meaning, if you could find a property for around $20k from either a bank or private seller and then put your $10-$15k rehab in there, you could potentially sell that property for $75 or so and be all cash with all cash profits upon the resell.

What an investor would want from you is a strong knowledge of your local inventory, what rent prices are in that area, and what the house could resell for if it were "perfectly" fixed.

This allows us to take care of any necessary title work to re-sell the home.

I've got (well my boss has) cash flow for the next 10 years, tenants paying down the mortgage and building equity, and hopefully a resell price significantly higher in 10 years.

It is easier to resell a single family too.

Many of these are your actual investors who bought properties under market only to resell them for profit.  

Flipping PropertiesIf the primary objective of your real estate business, or one of your real estate businesses, is to buy, potentially fix up an existing property and resell it within one year, the Internal Revenue Service can consider that to be an active trade or business.

@John Pauler,  Nah it's not just in your head, the perception of the creation of real estate with the primary intent to resell is as I mentioned, a slight but potential issue.  

My main concern was actually being able to buy & hold the property temporarily then sublet it & eventually be able to get another house in another city.Ideally using a double escrow would be extraordinary for this scenario since I could do a master lease with the option to buy at a later time & date.If you negotiate a pure “earn-out” or performance-based purchase deal to buy one property(orassets of a property) after another, and get 6-9 month options before I had to close it,I canadvertise that property or assets through all kinds of local, regional national or internationaladvertising media that are on or off-line,paying only on performance for the advertising -meaning, you only pay for the ads if they deliver a buyer that closes.The object here, on any purchase option I do, is to give the seller a pure earn-out and paythem out of a future sale or earnings.My goal in selling the property to another buyer is toget a decent upfront payment if possible,or a larger variable payment that's 10 to 25% above thepayments I would be making to the seller.Worst case, your buyer defaults and you either take the property back and resell it – it’s sort oflike a buy-here, pay-here car lot.Or you give it back to the original owner, who gets to keep allyou've paid him or her so far.But all you’ll have paid them came from monies other people paidto you first.Does that make sense?

It's really expensive and agree I could of done several deals if the home, land, foundation, utilities were all there and just needed to do slight repairs and resell it.