data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81f87/81f8779fc1e4d0cc2db4a1a4ee5d9727e2e48022" alt=""
20 October 2019 | 4 replies
Do the math!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c074/0c07400d29fbed8e5a10a94f09fc33bbdd24f6b9" alt=""
9 October 2019 | 9 replies
@Aaron Kinney surprisingly few people know the Lead Laws in MA. The
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75511/75511864b201673efe747fd94ab7cce1516f9b46" alt=""
9 October 2019 | 2 replies
But if your net positive monthly rental income is 2.5x your personal housing expense, and all other non-mortgage consumer debts are paid off, once all the math is done then you will still qualify, assuming you're working with a local-to-your-state investor friendly loan originator who understands math and stuff.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/098c1/098c120bbf234d464803a4bb9bdfea196c66966c" alt=""
19 February 2020 | 55 replies
Everyone waiting around for a correction to “get rich” will be exactly the same people too timid to invest when the market is tanking.The main thing is to have your numbers, risk tolerance, and maths in order and decide what is a good investment based on those factors; Not some mythical consensus of speculating know-nothings.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee8d7/ee8d72bf1f9ca9c1dc6f6b76b62fa9066a724ea8" alt=""
9 October 2019 | 8 replies
It's a simple math problem, that you will see over complicated with rationalizations when the simple math doesn't validate a property as being a good deal.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9266/d926683d772b0cdc1b07c1959e7d4606668c2e87" alt=""
14 January 2021 | 6 replies
Not only would they need to find other properties with the "feature," they would also have to do math demonstrating that the ones with the feature sold for more than the ones without the feature.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0dc8b/0dc8b2b234b7cf4b6ee0ce6064680e15fdb1f2eb" alt=""
30 October 2019 | 25 replies
Yeah my train of thought was basically similar to the math that Warren did.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fd33/4fd339fcd965e24a30ac7d7670176708c9a466f1" alt=""
9 October 2019 | 1 reply
It is difficult if you know how to create nice tables and you can do the math.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4f9f/c4f9fbfd8a53ae109237c8083213f94a3bf65b26" alt=""
10 October 2019 | 5 replies
The context of my question is - the math works good today...but in say 10-12 years if I want to sell the property...will I be able to unload it?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e312/7e3125000df37c987c14962f367694263d7dc977" alt=""
10 October 2019 | 2 replies
The way I see the math on this deal is it would take a little over 3 years for the partner to make his money back.