![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/2934552/small_1707526046-avatar-leonl62.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
11 February 2024 | 12 replies
For Maryland and maybe more specifically Baltimore, search @Ned Carey posts.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/2802146/small_1694942714-avatar-dannym192.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
11 February 2024 | 10 replies
That way you will get other investors working in that area to give you more specific advise.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1360603/small_1694592203-avatar-karenb128.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
11 February 2024 | 6 replies
Revenue Ruling 2002-83 is the specific ruling that covers related party transactions.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/2096113/small_1706630979-avatar-ldjrei.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
11 February 2024 | 8 replies
@Lindsey JohnsonLove to pick your brain on what worked and did not as I want to try this in a specific market.
11 February 2024 | 2 replies
I just can't figure out what is best for my specific situation.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1630918/small_1621514311-avatar-joshuag253.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
11 February 2024 | 8 replies
Perhaps more than one to accomplish specific goals.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/2182876/small_1626823686-avatar-gabriellab5.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
11 February 2024 | 27 replies
Can you be more specific with its location in Florida?
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/708424/small_1715618589-avatar-kateb21.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
11 February 2024 | 40 replies
In fact, she specifically acknowledges it.7.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/2111340/small_1694564508-avatar-dennisg96.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
11 February 2024 | 8 replies
And as always, don't make any major decisions based on advice from this site (or anywhere else online), at face value, without consulting specific professionals regarding your specific situation, etc.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1874457/small_1665187293-avatar-miriamv.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
11 February 2024 | 7 replies
With this being said, unless there's a specific reason for mom needing to be removed from title (i.e. social security benefits) it may be more prudent to pursue placing the home within a trust with your husband named as a primary beneficiary.