They are aware of the routine  and repeated use and turnover of these unit/dwellings and are reluctant to allow most "damages" alleged by landlords.IMPORTANT Even if she were to prevail on her BS carpet claim for $230, you'll hang her with your attorney's fees and costs since you won the majority of the contested amount of your security deposit.

Some are alleging inadequate management oversight by  the company, even though they are taking a fee to do so when some other platforms don't take a fee at all.BP does not allow me to post instructions to get to the in-depth review of them on my site  with more information.

Lets talk specifics... what exactly is airBNB sobbing about...It turns out Santa Monica happens to have one of the strictest regulations of STRs that they've encountered so they allege again violation of the constitution: https://consumerist.com/2016/09/06/airbnb-says-cit...This is a lawsuit they had filed in federal court.

Another thing that concerns me about WF is this very recent article with new allegations of WF mortgage fraud:https://theintercept.com/2017/08/12/theres-a-new-wells-fargo-scandal-this-time-its-the-trucoat/ .  

Him getting in the property and you having to evict can take a longer time than you telling him verify the allegations that a previous landlord sent to you about him.

Being the regulatory rule followers and whip smart fraud investigators that they are...the lender has directed Diane to produce these alleged loan documents from her ex to PROVE that she's not on them.

@David Clay who did the PM (allegedly) distribute the last months rent to?

I thought that was strange that he (allegedly) offered max out of the gate.

@Michael Plaks depending on the type of business, the age of the child, and the work performed, I do feel you can substantiate $10-12k wages.Presence of the following factors will lead the IRS to conclude that payments to a child are not deductible: failing to pay employment taxes and file information returns for the child (where required)paying the child a flat amount determined at the beginning of the year that is not based on the services actually performedlack of correlation between the dates and amounts of payments and the hours allegedly worked by the childfailing to maintain adequate records of the child’s hours worked and amounts earned, andcompensating the child for services that are routine family chores.In Eller v Commissioner 77 T.C. 934, the court allowed wages paid in 1974 to children ages 14, 13, and 9 in the amounts of $2,684, $2,616, and $1,868 respectively.

Several people, including myself, were left hanging for 30+ days after the deal was allegedly submitted for underwriting and approved.