If I wanted to get money out, I'd consider taking out a line of credit.But maybe the note holder would consider a discount to get their money right away.

REITs need to pay out 90% of income to share (actually 'unit') holders.

The judicial variants of the TCB sales are only free and clear when all lien holders have been properly notified of the impending sale in advance. 

The mortgage holder tried everything they could (We believe) and there is just nothing they can do, due to the imbalance of our income VS our bills.

It describes exactly why FHA/HUD Multifamily Loans are the best option for medium to long-term holders.

Yet when a neighborhood  declines, the real estate holder incurs big losses. 

That would make you a lien holder and a creditor, and puts you in a position to acquire the property when "we all lose it in a tax sale in a few years..."

Our system for taking credit cards requires the correct name of the card holder.

However if inadvertently they are not notified their rights as mortgage holder remain.I believe the Intent of OK tax law is that the title is sold free and clear of encumbrances however there is no guarantee in this case.Thank you for the link.

I was responding to another poster who stated that one negative affect of an appreciating property is a much higher property tax assessment.I don't live in Oregon so I don't know if you had some local increases passed by the voters in the last year that may have resulted in your increases, but there is def. a 3% cap as part of Measure 47 passed in the 1990s.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Ballot_Measures_47_(1996)_and_50_(1997)An example of the benefits are for long time holders of real estate.