@Puja Devi it all depends on your personal objectives.

If you're appealing to people who want an escape from digital distractions or a younger generation that increasingly uses streaming over cable, then probably not a big deal.

I hope to be objective here but I think you'll be pleasantly surprised by the quality and quantity of data that you get here.

Maybe digital land would be a better analog. 

Then focus on areas that you fit in your investment objectives.

They adjust their rates based on their objectives and risk premium in a given market.

I am a strategic communications/digital marketing professional looking to get a duplex for a house-hack with the goal to flip shortly after and eventually own rentals so I can have enough passive income to escape the rat race.

Exit strategy is to fix and hold as a long term rental.This will help keep an investor from shiny object syndrome and be able for others to help to identify a specific area that is best.

Ultimately, I think the safest course of action is just to treat everybody the same, rent to whoever passes your objective screening criteria, don't rent to anyone who doesn't, and always know the local/state/federal laws that effect you as a landlord better than those who are renting from you and stick to them. 

In other words, Valley Realty agreed that they were bound to disclose known facts, but objected to the idea that they were responsible for "conducting due diligence on the property," which may or may not have identified the soil issues that caused the massive earth movements which nearly destroyed the home.