![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/9972/small_1621349073-avatar-cvalle86.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
30 July 2008 | 19 replies
Like everyone assumes at some point in their real estate carreer I suppose that you need money to make money.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/8845/small_1621348671-avatar-djdemers.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
29 July 2008 | 11 replies
However, most of these were vacant (I assume the website didn't update when properties had been foreclosed on already).
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/5028/small_1621347243-avatar-mouschi.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
18 July 2008 | 15 replies
That is, assuming work continues fine as it is.
23 July 2008 | 11 replies
"Subject to" or Subject to Existing Mortgage is where the investor would take over the PAYMENTS on a current mortgage but does not assume personal liability of the property.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/4738/small_1621347135-avatar-barnardinc.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
11 July 2010 | 20 replies
This family coverage assumes only one spouse has a high deductible family plan.The minimum and maximum deductibles areSelf: $1150 - $5800 with family coverage having these amounts exactly double the self-only coverage.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1734/small_1733256128-avatar-minna.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
21 July 2008 | 5 replies
He owes nothing on the house but due to his own ciscumstances he does not want to take out a loan or assume too much risk by himself.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/8593/small_1621348591-avatar-4sale.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
26 July 2008 | 9 replies
Since your post was edited I assume you posted a solicitation, which can't be done in this particular forum.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1462/small_1621345681-avatar-troyce1.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
5 August 2008 | 20 replies
I assume you means to say "why not put down LARGER deposits"...
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/5028/small_1621347243-avatar-mouschi.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
24 July 2008 | 3 replies
I would assume a good thing, since it gives people easier access to the inner city, but would love to hear from a seasoned veteran on this!
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/10245/small_1718402702-avatar-lossmitigator.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
28 June 2009 | 26 replies
Does this assume that there is a niche of buyers out there who cannot get home loans with the marginal credit, but the system will gladly buy these notes from you?