Well, a few things.Firstly, those numbers aren't compelling purely from an ROI/ROE standpoint. 

Real estate alone on its face is generally considered less risky than stocks when we are talking pure riak premiums.real eatate however is commonly purchased with leverage, and leverage by definition increases your risk whether its on real estate or stocks. 

At this point whether or not you get laid off is pure speculation. 

Purely hoping for appreciation?

You can narrow down the buffet of choices pretty easily by eliminating options that purely just don't fit your strengths, goals or time commitment.

@John Clark There is no logic or sense to it, just pure emotions by caving to the tenant advocacy groups.One note on your "increase rents" suggestion.

The most impactful thing you can do, especially right out of the gate, is focus on pure volume of conversations.

@Bill Exeter @Dave FosterSo I can use the $333K portion to buy an investment property like duplex, triplex etc purely for rental use right?

It's all about finding (super-cheap) deals - pure and simple!

To do so, I can either:1) Pull it out prior to  purchase of the replacement property but lose an amount taxed as pure profit (20% times 80k) or2) Execute the next purchase, then refi pulling out 80k or more at the cost of refinancing.Is that about correct?