12 December 2013 | 8 replies
The law requires that financial institutions protect information collected about individuals; it does not apply to information collected in business or commercial activities."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61668/61668a97d570a9d2dce4ce1de71c85be8c148b3e" alt=""
13 December 2013 | 6 replies
I need some advice on a counter proposal and also some terms I should include to allow for the appropriate fix-up, protect me from improving the house and then being accused of 'violating the lease' and retaking an improved property and keeping my deposit.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a9c7/6a9c7d96d60a41480e1d2dc314b27e4696028019" alt=""
17 December 2013 | 9 replies
Could affect the buildings annual holding costs and resale ability.Another big one that developers deal with ( I used to work for one on commercial projects) is not only environmental issues but endangered species issues.Here in GA a stream was found to have "snail darters" a protected species.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52e05/52e050402f2669b23376790713dbb47ae1adbc52" alt=""
8 July 2014 | 12 replies
Now, I'd think the purpose to the restriction is to protect the bank, perhaps more to the banking system and the tax payers that end up picking up the tab in (being another subject) that there is no collusion between other parties out there of having the bank sell a property at a much lower price than what is reasonably seen as the fair market value for the property.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be8da/be8dabbf25498c81da95fd9b0354ffeabd2d453a" alt=""
13 December 2013 | 4 replies
I trust you are familiar with this Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection ActJanuary 2014 1500 pages of new regulations around RE Financing.
13 December 2013 | 3 replies
To protect yourself you should be putting your deposit with an earnest company.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a821/1a821c05826cca487166cd5cc79c2f683dc4e6c8" alt=""
16 November 2013 | 7 replies
Seems like there should be some borrower protection to prevent it or why wouldn't the banks make it more common practice??
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0735/b0735c3a4f3cd406ab9a4aadf2ee01d1430fb123" alt=""
7 May 2014 | 204 replies
Personally, I would prefer a protected parking area, even if it's a well-designed carport.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8db55/8db55b2decca6aef340a6dfdeb5b22caaebc44f5" alt=""
17 November 2013 | 2 replies
when buying real estate with subject to / wrap around mortgages how is the investor or home owner protected from each other after the deed is transfered.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be28f/be28f4b0a301b9f5102086e52e8303f78782d435" alt=""
3 May 2014 | 29 replies
@Karen Margrave , on non consumer real estate purchases, i.e. real estate purchases for investment, the SAFE act as well as the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau rules and regulations are not applicable.The usury laws are enacted by each state.