I've seen sooo many webinars and don't know who to trust.

This should eliminate the homeowner (1) selling a property while remaining liable for the note (subject to), (2) tying  up his property with a “buyer” who has no intent to close unless he finds someone to pay a higher price (wholesaler), (3) paying above market rental for an option to buy that can never be exercised (4) purchasing a property from a fix n flipper who did shoddy rehab, (5) purchasing a property with nebulous legal title, (6) contracting for home improvement with a fly by night contractor who then puts a mechanics lien on the property and (7) “listing” with a wholesaler disguised as a Realtor who doesn’t put the home on MLS. 

Don’t look at only their managers fee, ask what the average client pays in total fees (monthly, lease up, extensions, etc) as a percentage of rent collected.

We're under contract on a SFH in Indianapolis and are paying all cash.  

Negative cash flow is not something I’d be okay with, but I know there are some instances where people are okay with taking a small hit for a big pay off with the appreciation (and hopes that the rent will go up).

Landlords can conduct credit and background checks and have applicants submit  pay stubs and any other qualifications they may require of any applicant. 

I would be curious to see how this plays out in the end.Exactly, more than likely both are at fault by not paying attention or caring.

They would pay all utilities and maintenance on the property and provide 2 months security deposit. 

Incidentally, no one is paying us to be extra-special nice to you while we do it.

But, when there is an emergency you are sure glad that you have been paying all of those years.