data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32411/32411ddf85ac245ec030f9e4e8ce990b22794af2" alt=""
2 May 2021 | 7 replies
So now the tenant is technically "current".
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61fcd/61fcd0f599f5d7eef43f23a848a82bca6d4af8d8" alt=""
1 May 2021 | 11 replies
So it's technically completely possible, but you should ask your Realtor if it's pragmatically realistic in your specific market.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e306/7e306960ab739a8228ef10deeb13a7f5bc68960a" alt=""
5 May 2021 | 6 replies
So it is technically fully enforceable in court.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/165aa/165aa4516495ec0e2b47302e04be9a5ebb00f38d" alt=""
16 May 2021 | 5 replies
Everything demoed except the outside walls. it was akin to a teardown but because we left the outside walls it was technically not.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21ef8/21ef89ad0c4899915c6c296623ba0539d72aa2dd" alt=""
26 October 2021 | 21 replies
My personal residence is not technically a duplex - It's a single family home.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/409da/409da6811884493f30250154382c086aae824305" alt=""
3 May 2021 | 2 replies
I don't think the business matters, its a commercial complex where people aren't supposed to be living, technically speaking.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f02c4/f02c44b56bfef9235bebe624752c1685f0b4c8f2" alt=""
13 May 2021 | 9 replies
@Patrick Crehan, not sure it matters, but mine is technically a PCL, personal credit line, with my property as the collateral on the PCL.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa5d0/aa5d0aae93aa57fbc38ddc5bdadd2df0db58f804" alt=""
3 May 2021 | 1 reply
They technically built and owned the property in 2004 and let their in-laws stay there until their passing in 2016, at which time they moved into the house.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5dbf/d5dbf1147a200aa4e85d8345696574b54136e258" alt=""
4 May 2021 | 3 replies
You don't technically need a QI for a simultaneous swap of properties.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7994b/7994b311dac45a3fc6b695d69c6a7351cef77a1d" alt=""
16 May 2021 | 5 replies
My attorney also told me that cash for keys is technically illegal here in NJ so she advises against it but knows that its done under the table by others as a "moving fee".