No, you don't have to and you are in danger of her "training" you instead of vice versa.

Just reading one of my insurance journals and read this tidbit of FYI: "An industry group says Texas homeowners no longer are paying the highest insurance rates in the country, a distinction that now goes to Florida residents.

It distinctly states in my lease that I am allowed to do this.

I really don't understand the distinction.  

Dangerous to enter.

Buyers over leveraging with short term debt planning on strong rents over the long term to push the property to an acceptable cap rate will be in possible danger of a default.Now there is the going in cap rate and then the realized cap rate after value add strategies such as cutting property taxes, offloading utilities to the tenant, raising rents in a way under market property.

If one is eligible however, he or she may find that the Solo 401k fits what they want to do while offering some distinct advantages.

@David Dachtera the insurance would not cover the floors being replaced however my property managers contract states they would replace dangers done by pet.

Stachybotrys is a dangerous thing.

(Everyone, please note that there is a BIG distinction between "leveraging" and "over-leveraging")...