As long as you arent denying them as a tenant based on their age, race, sex, sexual orientation, religion, disability status, and familial status.When I accept section 8 tenants I also make sure they pass the same credit and background check as all of my other tenants.

Frozen capital until the market resets to new normal.By summer economic vacancy of 15% becomes the new normal.Vegas condos in trendy hotels like Signature MGM, VDARA, Palms are selling for $150-250k.Hospitality assets will be trading on ten-x auctions and $1M will buy you a 100 key Quality Inn in a decent metro like Tucson, Houston, etc.Multifamily holds on the longest as operators scale back cap ex and race to the bottom on concessions, rent price, etc.Retail strip centers in urban sprawl suburbs sit vacant no debt market or tenancy demand. 

You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make them drink.SwannyCreating Multifamily Millionaires one person at a time!!

Just by asking this question in a public forum you're butting up awfully close to discrimination pursuant to The Fair Housing Act.FHA prohibits discrimination in housing based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familiail status, and disability.There are some exemptions, but you'll want to be certain you're on the right side of those if you're going to use them.Now, with that said, you aren't required to bend over backwards and make obscene concessions just to make the property usable.

The law make it unlawful to discriminate on the bases of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin, disability, and familial status."

We all run the race just have different pace.

Conversely someone saves up 50k over 5 years and makes 65k a year from the job and wants to eventually quit the rat race.

Cashflow if you want out of the rat race, appreciation is just the icing on the cake. if you can get both all good. 

I think Sue K. kinda beat a dead horse throughout the post, howeverrrrr, I think she nailed it.

If the tenant meets the credit, income-to-rent, etc. ratios and you reject them (only after the interview), they could sue you for violation of Fair Housing --> claiming that it was only after meeting them in person (their race, gender, etc.) ... that made them unqualified.