It appears he received them and used them to leverage with a hedge fund overseas by putting up millions to get hundreds of millions to lend.

Based on another of Jarod's posts, he appears to be in the business of selling SFR's in Ohio, hence the rhetorical question.

I know its just appearances, but really if a guy pulls up in a beat up 78 ford and hands me a business card without an address (or worse, one printed out of an inkjet printer), it makes me ask myself why.

So, then it dawned on me that when Josh corrected it, the original sentenance no long appears.

That's something I won't tolerate, additionally, if it's rephrased so as to appear to be original and I recognize it as being along the lines of anything I have written, in my opinion it will still be plagiaristic and I'll make sure it won't be profitable for them.Why?

I understood there were some solid reasons to invest in Pittsburgh, but it appears my known reasons were just those at the tip of the iceberg.

Since all of these repairs appear to have been needed to make it habitable, the IRS is correct in saying they should be lumped with your purchase price, and depreciated over 27.5 years.If a year from now if you remodel a bathroom, then that would be depreciated over 5 years seperate from your original purchase/rehab costs.The loan you obtained on your original rental condo, is attached to that rental property.

Company A is offering more replacement cost.Company B is offering more business liability.All other "little" coverages appear to be about the same.

The tenant did invite me over to previous residence to select furniture for our home, and property was messy-- did not appear damaged.

*Failure to utilize each spouse's federal estate tax equivalent exemption can cost an estate up to $235,000 in unnecessary taxes?