data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12b7f/12b7f16c670759bf561305279ad57881d1f48dff" alt=""
28 February 2024 | 63 replies
Just had a call today and thinking about doing ProVision.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa82a/aa82ab63fa3622f4a4e09f39310c0e42bd816417" alt=""
28 February 2024 | 2 replies
Called and emailed several departments/people with every new person that finally replied sending me to a different person/department.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5ea4/b5ea49366b7bdc826c964beb98dadc09a9d4786c" alt=""
26 February 2024 | 32 replies
Here it goes:1) Investor fills out our app.2) Investor quickly submits POF.3) Investor answers pre-qualification questions.4) Call scheduled with me and we talk for a good 60min and have a fantastic call (Investor is made aware of our entire business model and how we operate.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8bbeb/8bbeb37b34a58da7d369b536894af806c9e03d38" alt=""
29 February 2024 | 4 replies
Considering that the back-end ratio needs to be roughly 36 percent in order to qualify for a loan, it seems that the mortgage costs associated with each newly purchased property should be 36% of the revenue generated by that property -- we might call this a 36% rule: mortgage cost / rental income = .36Please let me know -- is this feasible or advisable?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b582f/b582f7e52e4162edec059db2cb43c595d786784b" alt=""
27 February 2024 | 2 replies
That indicates the source of moisture is internal.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/081fa/081fa339b28084a1e31dc78da7530d492dc3aca6" alt=""
28 February 2024 | 12 replies
What you are referring to is called underwiting.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b6e9/5b6e98794566010f53bf388c88d4adfefe1f3b46" alt=""
1 March 2024 | 31 replies
Once a lawsuit kicks off, there's this thing called legal discovery.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7a0d/a7a0da3203e284e9ad247fc0a3bbfe8bfca75159" alt=""
28 February 2024 | 3 replies
Good call on the duplex vibes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bef04/bef04ebd42778b5b66de3ddae9e084d938c6e6a6" alt=""
28 February 2024 | 24 replies
We have been working through the applications for our affected homeowners, and have had to call the county several times for clarifications.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94e7a/94e7a1e9d7a93df3846be02c6c7bab98b54cfb20" alt=""
26 February 2024 | 5 replies
Their insights highlight the necessity for a careful approach to vapor barriers and insulation, emphasizing compatibility with the building's original design and moisture management needs.Here's the plan:Ceilings/Attic Floors: Elevate insulation to R-38 or above, incorporating vapor retarder paint or smart vapor retarders for optimal moisture management.Walls: Boost insulation to R-13 or more, utilizing smart vapor retarders or materials with adjustable permeability.Basements, Crawl Spaces: Increase insulation to R-19, targeting ground moisture and internal humidity control.Materials: Opt for eco-friendly, breathable insulation and vapor barrier materials that preserve the building's historic charm.This meticulous approach elevates the property's energy efficiency and moisture management, enhancing its value and ensuring a profitable return without compromising its architectural integrity.I'd like to hear your thoughts, experiences, or any advice you might have on integrating vapor barriers and insulation in renovating historic properties.