The remediation company will not give an absolute move out recommendation, because they refer to a third party company for environmental assessment (minimum 300-1200 not covered by insurance), but the tech has indicated it would be a good idea for them to move out for 5-7 days.  

But assuming that once you file it is a quick process of a couple days then it seems it's just an attempt at being equitable to all parties involved....especially the one that is "losing" on the deal.

Total monthly rent $2,800 (conservative) $2900-3000 (realistic)all expenses accounted for (50% rule) and mortgage comes out to $2250 (this includes property management) Net profit would be $550The only set back is that it isn't in the best area.... definitely not a war zone, but probably C or C- Any advice on this deal, because the monthly cash flow looks fantastic, I am just unsure about the area variable. 

Having a financial equitable interest is what is conveyed with a sale contract and what investors usually attempt to sell or assign, as having a valuable interest in a property.Any contract only takes the parties to a settlement, if all is agreeable, the parties may continue with the terms to a settlement, so long as they have a legal contract.The question of an equitable interest can come up if a seller decides to avoid a contract and not sell.

I'm a little late to the party, however did you find someone to show the house, do you still have it for sale?

I'd suggest a conservative business casual look:  khakis and button down shirts, no tie, solid shoes that are somewhere between a dress shoe and a work shoe  (no sneakers). 

But, if your CONSERVATIVE analysis of the numbers can result in acceptable Return On Investment to you, then you shouldn't need to bank on appreciation.

I think that's wrong for all parties involved.  

I've received many different answers from many different parties, so any advice from fellow investors is helpful.

The parties settled for an undisclosed amount in August.