I think if you step back and look at this you'll realize her entitled personality is driving your irritation more than the payment dates.If she had called you, apologized, explained a loss of income and proposed this plan would you have agreed to those payments? 

That's a great idea.... probably too far gone at this point, however, we will have the toxicology report back tomorrow or Friday.. so if there is anything toxic in the property, I think I will go that route. 

There's nothing on my city website and people are getting irritated how early in the morning it's being done (waking people up obviously)....

Thanks to Ontario's disastrous implementation of renewable energy, electric heat is now toxic to tenants.

if you don't mind having toxic credit for a long time.- Deficiency judgements are NOT rare.

That was about the time I decided I did not want to be an agent anymore.A week before close they sent an e-mail telling my client the down payments had doubled and the interest rates were all higher.By the way, at six figures I can get a little irritated. 

The first 8,000 times, it was fine, now it's just irritating! 

Further, it irritates the title company and the lawyer who drafter the documents.

It is very irritating when I or one of my staff members have to request that the tenant pay rent in escrow in court before she may obtain a continuance for a trial, but the judges don't know that that is required...  

My guess is that if you sold it off-market to a private party it would matter less, but then you'd have less exposure of course.The biggest issue I've noticed about properties where the zoning is odd/unusual/not what you'd expect based on the current usage, is that often they are in very not-great areas.For example, the property you're talking about, would not surprise me if it's on a short street and next to or across from an abandoned / boarded-up factory, railroad tracks, etc. and all the properties on that short street are either vacant or in rough shape.I'm not just being pessimistic, I've researched a lot of properties and the few times these zoning mismatches pop up, seems more often than not to be a situation like that.So to me the issue isn't the zoning per se, it's that the zoning itself is an indicator of something else that's less desirable about the property, such as what's around it.The Providence zoning code is online and in the Industrial Districts section defines Light Industrial (M-1) as: "The M-1 light industrial district is intended for light industrial and office park uses that accommodate a variety of manufacturing, assembly, storage of durable goods, and related activities provided that they do not pose toxic, explosive or environmental hazard in the city."