![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1016289/small_1621507555-avatar-davidm825.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
28 August 2018 | 28 replies
Read books, read these forums, listen to podcasts and save yourself the $20k they want to charge you for all the same information
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1060844/small_1621508256-avatar-gursewak.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
25 August 2018 | 8 replies
If ARV is $103, then you charge then $105,000, if not more.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/599188/small_1696385231-avatar-tuant1.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
23 August 2018 | 3 replies
For example, if a delayed release is being recorded for a lien on title, the SB2 fee would be charged to the seller since they are likely paying the release recording fee.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/207535/small_1695586643-avatar-anthony19318.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
23 August 2018 | 2 replies
The $1500 in origination charges isn't the profit center, the sale of a fresh new mortgage for $10k on the secondary market is where the profit is, that $1500 is small potatoes.No reason not to call your original loan person.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/927416/small_1621505686-avatar-jordonn.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
27 September 2018 | 33 replies
Good news is - you don’t pay more for a great lender typically because banks pay a ton for advertising, and great lenders are referral based so they can be competitive, and be compensated well without charging you more.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/956316/small_1621506256-avatar-kevinc325.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
11 September 2018 | 11 replies
It's a racket that I think core logic developed to charge lenders.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/441571/small_1621476804-avatar-joes90.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
21 September 2018 | 14 replies
If you were managing a property and these two issues were on a tenant call back, would either have been charged to the owner?
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/217378/small_1621433958-avatar-allansmith.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
23 August 2018 | 2 replies
If tenant wants to pay and stay, they need to pay everything owed including late fees, non-sufficient fund charges from the bank, and the eviction filing costs.You can stop issues like this by only accepting certified funds after the rent is late.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/895255/small_1694717655-avatar-prestonw11.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
24 August 2018 | 2 replies
I figure you could charge the tenants a base rate for electricity every month and that goes to paying them off.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/144891/small_1621419265-avatar-aliz0611.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
25 August 2018 | 1 reply
E.g. if my property manager would charge one month's rent in order to find a new tenant, in addition to the lost rent while the unit sits empty plus the turnover costs (painting, carpet cleaning, etc), shouldn't vacancy rates be padded even further?