13 March 2011 | 6 replies
Resources of guarantors.In a more traditional mortgage loan underwriting, you're looking only at the person, not a business, and you're infinitely more concerned about that person's income.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/51583/small_1621411531-avatar-jeff1.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
15 March 2011 | 3 replies
As assets build (and you become a more attractive lawsuit candidate) additional steps should be taken to "isolate" potential problem assets.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/68765/small_1621414148-avatar-acherry04.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
25 June 2011 | 11 replies
I would also really appreciate just talking to a more experienced investor about the deal who might be able to offer some insight - I've noticed the DFW BP community is very good about taking time for newbies.Thanks,Ashton
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/44736/small_1621408007-avatar-invmatchmaker.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
22 January 2011 | 16 replies
Like I said, it sounds like a SS...she didn't say anything that explained that fact away.I even asked if the seller owes the bank more than what the home is being sold for and her answer was yes.Perhaps there's a more specific question I can ask.But I'm wondering if I should simply treat this as a short sale and make an offer like I would any other SS, or should I be leary of things going awry?
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/57078/small_1653842281-avatar-tonynguyen10.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
18 January 2011 | 12 replies
Going after multis is more targeted so I'd suggest a more personalized campaign that included mailing and phone calls.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/35038/small_1621367776-avatar-bienesraices.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
15 January 2011 | 3 replies
Should I just get the cheapest single pane type I can find, or would there be any point in getting a more expensive "low e" glass type or double-paned?
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/52911/small_1668272119-avatar-bryanhancock.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
5 February 2011 | 29 replies
You can use the FMV after holding the property for a length of time to the point that the FMV may be a more accurate representation of value than what you have in it, since markets change in time.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/66781/small_1621413873-avatar-relasvegas.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
17 January 2011 | 23 replies
This in fact makes sense intuitively as well because an REO in good condition is a more marketable property as buyers consider it almost equivalent to a retail property.
2 February 2011 | 23 replies
It is said that history tends to repeat itself and it is also said that only a fool would make the same mistake twice, so your guess is as good as mine.If we ever have massive RE appreciation rates in the double digits again, I would venture to guess such a scenario would not take place for at least another 2 decades or more, but I was wrong once before (wink, wink)Kidding aside, I believe that once we are over this "correction" and get through the massive amount sof lender owned properties, we will encounter a more steady and reasonable price inflation of RE.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/66976/small_1621413899-avatar-stole.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
22 January 2011 | 3 replies
Even a more objective exector will still probably want to get a decent value for the property.