14 September 2015 | 15 replies
usually it means either:1) that they have over-drafted a bank account, and now can't get another2) they don't have enough of the required documentation to open a bank account
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e529f/e529f814fc4bd40e45d6d010c7ccc8c62844d772" alt=""
4 July 2015 | 5 replies
Have them submit invoices to you, describe the job you want done not how to do it.
3 July 2015 | 2 replies
The owners are disabled persons as indicated in the documents.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d8ea/4d8ea7fef5c9b39be0b90de06e6def5fd3a0a09e" alt=""
10 July 2015 | 29 replies
not saying I side stepped anything, just saying she has documentation from a lawyer and we will see what title says.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e898/2e89866cba1c17d2f33d0b3548a2fe860a33b853" alt=""
6 July 2015 | 11 replies
Therefore, you will have to be able to put up the EMD and submit a preapproval letter.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b7db/8b7db1170a52ec95675b76797f2f3f9e1bd01878" alt=""
5 July 2015 | 1 reply
They sent me an email not even any written sent me to me documentation and didn't even let me do a hearing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f82f/0f82fb8cdc18ed2f48b82eb9707724b5564b139a" alt=""
13 October 2021 | 7 replies
It may also require you to help fill out the paperwork with the tenant in order to get it submitted.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05c91/05c91ab53607970fce4adf69fb42d2704bb65a45" alt=""
30 October 2021 | 5 replies
@Connor O'Brien- I didn't read the document in detail, I actually didn't see the pre-qualification part.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a40e/9a40e6d75d291b12839387aa2cb0b8a99c1beeec" alt=""
12 October 2021 | 0 replies
You can read the details and submit comments to HUD here: https://www.federalregister.go...Given that vaccines, jobs, and housing assistance is widely available, I question the need for such a ruling.