But if down the road interest rates were, oh I don't know, 8% or so, they would maybe only be able to get a $130,000 home.I don't think incomes would quickly and magically go up with interest rates, so it leads me to believe that over time, home prices would have to adjust and that $200,000 home would have to make its way toward $130,000.I understand this is a very simplistic way of seeing it, but I wonder if any have any ideas?

Only in such an environment can you achieve both current and long term profitability.While the above seems simplistic, few locations can achieve all three criteria.

That is a very simplistic summary, but this is the method discussed in our seminar.

Loved the video and I love the way it breaks it down into 7 simplistic steps.

If you take an overly simplistic view, the reality is that virtually anyone CAN do it, but almost everyone will not, statistically speaking.

The Chart is too simplistic. 

Now, you need to attract and enlist those who will see benefit in the project, add their value, and together bring the project to fruition.That may seem overly simplistic but it’s not rocket science.  

So you have to weigh the options of simplistic price points versus the balance of technology and personal touch. 

The simplist solutions to this problem is simply not to invest in those asset classes.

In otder to refinance (and keep) the property, you need to bring in $450k...Of course, this is a simplistic example.