Lender has risk if as @Chris Seveney mentioned buyer puts a second behind your first  this causes the first lender to have to go through a full foreclosure to remove the second in a default scenario. 

I believe it would be irresponsible to remove Lane's ability to post to the forums, as that would remove his ability to defend himself.

Just remain wary of the potential consequences of operating in an anti-landlord jurisdiction: vacancy taxes, potential vacancy control, inability to remove deadbeat tenants, etc.Coincidentally, Jesse Vasquez posted "why your MTR isn't renting" on YouTube yesterday.  

My water usage bill is the same,  general lability coverage is the same, if and when I have to replace my water service line it will cost the same, the cost for my lawncare and snow removal costs the same, exterminating services cost the same and the list goes on.   

Just some food for thought.Also, could you explain a bit more about the cash flow you're referring to, specifically for flipping?

My thinking is that if I remove them completely it might bring back a little more curb appeal to the property and make it more inviting to potential renters. 

I have a daughter with some health issues and has a strict diet regime of prepared foods.

Quote from @Stuart Udis: I suspect they drew you a flow cart and then your conversations went something like this:Please kindly remove your bugs from my office

You need to remove this tenant.

You must have done everything reasonable, even unreasonable, to cure the issue and document it.I lost $200.00 once in court because a tenant removed the range and would not let us reinstall it.