I guess that depends on who is interpreting. 

My interpretation is that this concerns the removal of the tenant and personal property after they've already lost an eviction case. 

Negar, this is subject to someone's interpretation of 'directly impacting' a neighboring parcel.

My interpretation would be you would also have to sign the contract or include and or assigns to be added later.

Hey Kyle - thanks for the detailed response and I'm completely in agreeance with your interpretations.  

Evictions, drafting operating agreements, interpreting tax court cases, creating an entity, etc@Katie Lepore may be able to help you.

I try to interpret my tenants as being genuine and honest, but also capable of mistakes and still bound to the terms of the lease. 

I don't have statistics but previously each room was hearing ~30 cases an hour, now it seems like less than ten meaning you will quite possibly have evictions spread out if you have multiple.4) Covid-19 makes it unique, seating every 6 feet with a checker board pattern in the court room.I expect every Ohio County especially in our major cities of Cleveland, Cincinnati, Columbus, etc will have their own interpretation with some variety...same with Detroit, Indianapolis, Fort Wayne. 

It's admittedly a gray area, but it all comes down to how a judge (or Fair Housing investigator) interprets the law.To be clear: I am not a fan of these provisions of the CARES Act (and I've written my congressional reps to tell them as much, and happy to share a draft if anyone would like to do the same), but the fact remains it is a currently enacted federal law.

I have no idea if they will really do that or how strictly they will interpret things if they do, we are in uncharted territory.