Basing your appeal on your purchase price alone is unlikely to work out in your favor, all else being equal. 

Before we move forward we were wondering if it would be wrong to offer all of them an equal chance to work with us.

Profit share total value will have to equal more than the discounted amount, and 2. likely sufficiently more to account for the money seller could otherwise make with the money they’re giving up during that five year period.

If they are VERY professional, they will have their processes in writing as verification that it is enforced equally and fairly by their entire staff.6.

The debt coverage service ratio (DCSR) will be a factor and you will need to have a net worth equal to the amount that you want to borrow.

Leverage is great in realizing appreciation on the way up but equally as bad on the way down.

Also, it makes sense only if you can get the refi of ARV equal or higher than what you borrowed otherwise you'd have to put your own money right?

Silence equals assent.

If the rent is exactly equal to the mortgage then I'd avoid it.

It would take 20+ years of negative cash flow to equal cash already out the door.There is a sweet spot but numbers are not the only thing, you need to weigh the risk and many other factors such as property location potential for appreciation, property condition...A property in Pittsburgh area with 20% down and 100/month cash flow is not a good deal but if that was in DC you would be celebrating by doing backflips.So lots to ponder but key is never over leverage