If you're looking for a market that has landlord friendly laws and high growth potential, I would go with Columbus, OH.

In short, it may be more valuable to pursue areas where the cash flow isn't as strong on paper because it's made up for in other problems you avoid with properties in areas that cash flow well on paper at first but suffer from high turnover, a high level of vacant properties nearby, etc.- Check up frequently on the property and conduct walk throughs as allowed by your lease agreement.- Hire a solid property manager who gets paid to keep tabs on the property for you. 

The vale of depreciation on property as well as business loss are capped if you have high W2.  

High BP, I’m very new yet have had years of credit cards, building credit and working on consolidation. 

Are you happy with the return on that investment and do you think it will continue to appreciate (highly dependent on where you are at in the Bay Area)?

Where my primary residence is, cash flow negative, entry point for anywhere around here is too high, and I like the market out that way.

On the other hand  If you know the markets that are more favorable and attract high qualities tenants land lording can be very easy with little to no worries.  

That would effectively cancel out the benefit of adding the labor to the Cost Seg.

By integrating CPAs into the initial discussions, real estate funds can be structured more effectively, with tax considerations and financial goals addressed comprehensively from the start, ultimately avoiding costly amendments and adjustments down the line.

One thing I'd keep in mind with mid-term rentals is I expect the mid-term rental market to get highly saturated at some point just like the STR market has.