
4 October 2023 | 11 replies
Some investors are very good at taking the emotion out of their work, and an example applicant such as this one obviously has red flags all over the place.

26 September 2020 | 13 replies
For me it got too emotional, it was a dream come true to run those cottages.

4 January 2023 | 21 replies
Worry about what you can control, and don't emotionally invest yourself, be passionate but not fearful.

5 October 2023 | 16 replies
. $250.Going off what @Russell Brazil said, it has to be a registered service animal, not an emotional support animal.

4 October 2023 | 27 replies
Very useful input @Scott Mac on the difference between 80 LPs @ $50k and 4 at @ $1MM.My bigger vision is to get to a place with back office overheads, internal cash flows, and technology that would allow passive ranch investing to be available for as low as $500/ea for retail, non accredited investors.That is the democratization aspect and the vision/values vs execution dilemma I face when testing at $50,000 vs $1,000,000.Due to the registration being much cheaper, I must go the route of accredited investors only, for now.My subjective, populist, nationalist, rural Montana beliefs deep down in my bones that still emotionally and personally influence my decision-making-bias is that what we have in Montana is 1-special, 2-should be shared without being too commercialized and gentrified, and 3-is quickly being lost.With ranches as we all know, and I fully accept, becoming only for the UHNW, part of my core-motivation and driving belief is that technology (online syndication) should present an opportunity in the marketplace to bring in more of the "Average American" to participate, appreciate, and benefit from this asset; not just for it's historical performance, but for its actual tangible benefits (the feels).Pride in ownership, sense of place, vesting/shared interest in ecology, community, and food production.First it must be an asset though, one that makes sense in someone's diversified portfolio.

17 October 2023 | 8 replies
Little things like that can affect the emotional value, not necessarily the appraised value.I think it is good that you are questioning it.

4 October 2023 | 10 replies
Also, how to deal it when an emotion support animal is requested when there is no pet policy?

28 September 2021 | 133 replies
It is someone’s emotional agenda to justify their purpose for giving that advice.

7 April 2022 | 26 replies
Are you simply trolling or do you make decisions based on emotion rather than logic?

13 October 2023 | 7 replies
. - Less than 80% of ask is a low ball offer that is likely to offend an owner-occupant who is emotionally attached to their home.