But you'd grab the business once even if it didn't come in perpetuity cause you see what's right in front of you, because that's how you're compensated.

This may include sellers offering off-mls Buyer Broker compensation, similar to commercial experiences I've had. 

And Realtors shouldn’t be compensated like rocket scientists or doctors.

This whole lawsuit is about NAR and the industry not disclosing or talking about commissions, compensation and how that’s paid.A licensed agent will be held by law to have any buyers they are working with under a buyer/broker agreement, it’s not going to be an option, that’s the past.

I’ve known some where you sign for a day… that was before the settlementSo this is part of the turmoil.. why else would an agent work with a buyer without promise of compensation? 

This is to compensate them for the coordination and supervision of the work.

The best I understand it commissions will no longer be displayed on the MLS and buyers representation agreements will be required along with a compensation disclosure that everyone signs showing what the buyers broker will make.Realtors aren't going anywhere as the home buying process is not simple and easy.

If they have a buyer and see .5% or 0% offered as buyer agent compensation, you'll cut your potential inquiries by 80-85% as many agents will move onto a listing that offers 2-3% buyer agent commission.Just my $.02Hope this helps!

I was a victim of identity theft13.

When negotiating the listing agreement sellers and their agent agree on a commission rate as well as an “offer of cooperating compensation” or split.This “offer of cooperating compensation” defines how the commission will be split up between the agent for the seller (listing agent) and the agent for the buyer.