I know that this thread is a year old but I've been just reviewing the current rules of allergies versus ESA and since this thread started the Iowa Supreme Court made a ruling on a related case that supports what Costin I. suggested. https://www.animallaw.info/cas...

I agree, the beaches are supreme and if you go inland a mile and its like you're in good ole east Texas (except the pines are much dinkier, and the deer are pathetic).

Oxford House, Inc. litigated the issue and in 1995 the United States Supreme Court considered the issue in City of Edmonds, WA v.

According to preliminary research, Ohio's Supreme Court passed a landmark decision just this year on "piercing the corporate veil".

The Florida supreme court set a precedent that allows a plaintiff to seize a single members stock to pay off any judgment.  

Also, for what its worth, here in New Jersey, a 1975 State Supreme Court sub-committee ruling stated in part that for a CPA to help form or dissolve a corporation could constitute practicing law without a license.

"Inclusive Communities Project"Eventually there might be a Supreme Court ruling that would ban all discrimination based on "source of income".

Something like GE Supreme Silicon is good stuff to use.

And now for the icing on the cake: after the recent Pa Supreme Court decision (Slice of Life vs Hamilton Twp), all of the Townships in the Poconos are in the process of regulating STRs in residentially-zoned areas (limiting # of STRs, imposing length of stay restrictions, imposing annual rental limits, imposing home inspections for STRs, etc, etc)Poconos are great if you don't mind operating in an area with a tremendous over-supply of housing.

The Supreme Court just made it very easy for POTENTIAL tenants to sue for discrimination even if there is no basis for it - because they FEEL like they were discriminated against.