Both Democrat and Republican presidential campaigns have found common ground on housing policy by proposing the use of federal lands for homebuilding.

Another may see it from the perspective that they've been getting a free ride all this time and now the party has ended.

Without knowing the appreciation in the area you bought, that part is hard to answer, but just given your numbers I would definitely sell.

Obviously would change from person to person, but I'm curious what people have used before that has been effective for both parties. 

That said, in Florida, the parties can enter into an agreement that qualifies the tenant's and landlord's use of the premises.

For my part, I wouldn't call anyone who started out with "don't waste my time."

You can ALWAYS negotiate if both parties want to and with you having the option to back out of the deal you have the ability to leverage the seller into "wanting" to negotiate. 

Room rentals are more common than you would think in HCOL cities, the living in the trailer part is not something I personally would do nor do I think its the best idea, but buying a house and renting out rooms to people works out better than you would think and is a great way to get your foot in the door with real estate.

Take off the party hat 🥳😔The recent decision by the Federal Reserve has sparked widespread enthusiasm across markets.

To manage this relationship, landlords should establish clear boundaries, respect space, use a third-party property manager, and set expectations for tenant responsibilities.