The LTV change doesn't make sense unless there was something that caused alarm to the treasury/UW team of said lender, but they should have explained/ be able to explain why to you.

Question for anyone who owns large multi-family dwellings:I own an apartment building in Kansas that has a central fire alarm system.

The first one wasn’t as alarming so I understand the tenant not being alarmed but 376?!

This is in fact what I did tell them and they instead chose to bombard me with another set of bad deals and accompanying alarming messages.

That's why I'm not alarmed.   

Also, if i pay the new landlord directly would that alarm the new landlord and back out? 

Inspector required whole house fire alarm.

I got rid of about $2,500 worth of trash out cost but then some one can in that night and took all the appliances ...lol Wont do that again or get an alarm.

If the numbers were dismal again like July's report, more alarm bells would be going off about a recession.

The definition of qualified property under Section 179 was expanded in 2017 under TCJA to include the following real property improvements to nonresidential buildings: Roofing Fire protection and alarm systems Security systems HVAC systems So you can expense roofing under Section 179 as long as it is an improvement to a commercial property and meets the Section 179 criteria.