They need to be held accountable and pay for the time they usurped your property.

A DST is like owning a property in a partnership, but is technically held in the same name as what the old property was held.  

We have a renters agreement, which states tenants shall be held responsible for all costs to landlord's repair or maintenance of any plumbing stoppage or slow-down caused by tenant.

By doing this, you are extending the policy's coverage to include your property manager, should they be held liable for any incidents or accidents on your property.Why is it important to add your property manager as an additional insured?

Greg If you are referring to hare money that is not what I used. 80% was financed through the bank and 10% debt held by the seller. 

I don't think its as easy as people make it out to be. 

But with my head held high gone was all the normal trappings of RE success being served as a big slice of humble pie :(.

Just off the top of my head, I wouldn't feel super comfortable with non-US properties because properties in the US are held to HUD code (at a minimum).

Most people selling properties are not professional investors.

Quote from @Jason Bohling: @Dmitriy Fomichenko here’s a link briefly describing what I’m talking about:https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2024/10/24/income-limit-for-0-percent-capital-gains-bracket-2025.htmlJason, you are describing selling long-term capital assets held in your personal name.Dmitriy is talking about doing a roth conversion.Two separate tax topics.