The pregnant one will often stock up on calories and go laterally 30 feet or so looking for a new food source for her spawn, potentially infecting a neighboring unit.When I was an undergrad, I inherited bed bugs from a previous tenant.

Perhaps I have the wrong idea about money, but I start with 2,000 calories a day, which is the amount of food I need to keep my metabolism going.

.- Seller offers to owner finance the deficit in the appraisal of 20k.- Seller does this by offering terms of a loan and is willing to take second position behind primary loan.  

Then when there were a significant loss and the association didn't have enough reserve fund(s) to cover the loss (or deductible) they would be forced to implement an assessment meaning that every unit owner would be assessed whatever their % of the deficit.

If the partners agree to specially allocate one item (for example, capital gains) 80/20 for economic purposes per SEE safe harbor, the corresponding tax amounts must also be allocated 80/20.However, IRS has a framework that can reallocate the partnership items based on the “ partner's interest in the partnership” if IRS determines the method of sharing the partnership items lacks the “Substantial Economic effect” (SEE) To meet the SEE, there are strict rules to maintain meaningful capital accounts including Deficit Makeup Requirement for those accounts.With the requirement, the partner must at some point contribute sufficient capital to eliminate the deficit, and the partner has the burden of the loss that partnership has and the allocation of the partnership will be respected by the IRS.This is a very high-level summary of the rules and is not comprehensive. there are many exceptions as well.Since the substantial economic effect, safe harbor allocation rules are complex and requires considerable additional recordkeeping, it's easier to follow PIP standard. 

That's a $300 deficit which doesn't sound bad since you will be living in one of the units and saving approximately $500 in rent.

We incurred a net loss for the years ending December 31, 2017 and 2016, and had an accumulated deficit of $11.5 million and $7.4 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.The consolidated statements of operations below from the same SEC filing shows 2017 net loss of $4,085,485.For the yearendedDecember 31,2017For the yearendedDecember 31,2016Non-interest revenue:Origination fees$871,771$218,862Servicing fees509,939237,943Total operating revenue1,381,710456,805Net interest income (expense):Interest income2,287,701901,234Interest expense(1,921,693)(842,419)Net interest income366,00858,815Net revenue1,747,718515,620Cost of revenue(251,431)(131,753)Gross profit1,496,287383,867Operating expenses:General and administrative1,082,1371,083,200Sales and customer support1,316,356826,289Development678,844590,396Regulatory457,844596,687Marketing and promotions1,338,635983,812Total operating expenses4,873,8164,080,384Loss from operations(3,377,529)(3,696,517)Interest expense707,95643,695Net loss$(4,085,485)

Without the massive US deficit there is no Chinese economy (virtually) - even their relationships with other economies relies back on the US economy.

Plus with all of the unfunded pensions  (think teachers, firemen, policemen, city, county, state workers) those deficits need to be funded and that means taxes will be going up and generally that means property taxes.

I forget the specifics, but when I spoke with a planner, he mentioned that if the deficit was within 5 or 10% of the needed sqft, a true variance wouldn’t be needed.