With that said, I certainly see the logic in your approach.

Your logic is sound, and having just returned from three days in Seattle I will say that the older homes in the parks I saw (not that my sample is representative) generally looked quite clean.But what you are saying seems, on the surface, to be the polar 180 degree opposite of what Frank Rolfe and co are telling people at their boot camps.He claims that the homes in the date range you are discussing (60's and 70's) are worth merely a few thousand dollars - and that the biggest way to get in trouble with park-owned homes is to overpay for them.

It is 200 pages of extreme detail with a logically oriented 30 day plan of due diligence.I know there's a lot of BS in the real estate guru industry - this is not part of that world of BS.MHP's a unique niche and there is no other source of solid due diligence info.

You have a logical history, so I would think you can get a conventional loan.

Approaching your occupants logically and allowing them 15-30 days to move out before you begin the legal process is always my route 1.

Unfortunately, from a logical standpoint, more words doesn't necessarily equal more proof.

If the NOI stays a constant, and you move the purchase price, then the logic makes sense. 

Would it be more logical to get units rented out and once the refi process is done..I move in one of the units.How should I go with this process?

Yes, but that isn't logical. 

His "logic" was that since they were married, they should only have to pay one fee instead of two.