data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e97a/0e97a9472535e04ee2125888f1a59815b4d458b1" alt=""
18 February 2016 | 2 replies
I can't imagine you'd want to take it as-is with the tank, because if you try to remove it after buying and find the soil is contaminated, and possibly contaminated the ground water, you could be looking at a bank-breaker of a job.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ccf8c/ccf8c632a253061eaaaf0064b5c1ec49aa34e539" alt=""
18 February 2016 | 4 replies
I attempt to estimate my tax bill every year and I am ALWAYS wrong.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af302/af302e00dd67edd692a51bae3cb5c3dd59a32de0" alt=""
21 February 2016 | 8 replies
If you are referring to the ability to terminate the tenancy at your discretion sooner, a M2M tenant would generally be the correct choice, but perhaps the wrong approach.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efcf8/efcf8c70218a8a6d4da6a2b1a72713ee26359d00" alt=""
25 February 2016 | 17 replies
I don't think you can go wrong with Katy, Cypress or Sugarland (I have done deals in Katy and Cypress).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1788f/1788f41e90ca355d3534e6917aecb1a17973aeef" alt=""
6 March 2016 | 17 replies
What could go wrong?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5d7d/e5d7d852bee8430225d26e77ea86f0db85db4bfc" alt=""
28 July 2016 | 16 replies
You could have a crappy list (it's a static "cold" list), your message could be all wrong, targets may have fatigue from too much solicitations by others such as the absentee lists, which get pounded.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0bfb3/0bfb319ea46ae97aabf339732675d3ac14998183" alt=""
29 March 2016 | 61 replies
And our fault was that my dad picked a wrong word.
16 December 2016 | 2 replies
Is there anything wrong with taking such an approach.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fcf0/2fcf04110506908ef8a7c46d5c60fa83a067202c" alt=""
13 March 2016 | 16 replies
Doesn't mean they aren't going to get more, or maybe having one property is enough for them.And you're wrong about being "too small" for a PM.