That's much more realistic and you'll be able to sell deals faster and thus do higher deal volume when you're not overpricing your deals.

I am at the point where I have a enough volume of flips/rental properties that I negotiate everything from contract work to property management fees.

I am probably in the minority on BP, but I am not a fan of the "throwing out offers in volume and crossing your fingers" approach.

Having held Senior Leadership roles in rigorous environments that are intense I'm accustomed to adjusting quickly, planning & execution in large scales relating to facility health, contractors, employees and volume.

Not huge money makers but you get volume and steady work.

By you achieving $1 mil in less than three years n before the age of 30 speaks volumes of your future.

@Brian TurnboughYes, I only work with rentals because the process to rent in the city is very complex and it is in high volume.

I do replace all toilets with low volume flush when I buy a new property.

That could be both good (e.g. cheaper costs for investors) and bad (e.g. lawyers paying less attention to you since they make money by doing volume work).  

I have seen the numbers put out by the apartment association and due to volumes of scale, they can do better than the 50% rule.Seeing the 50% rule excludes financing, the zero leverage has zero impact.I am in a high rent market (my lowest market rent is ~$1.6K and my highest would be ~$4.5K (those are STR doing ~$8K)) and believe in high rent markets the 50% rule is conservative except in cases where there is an HOA.