Most due on sale clauses prohibit the note holder to change the entitlement of the real estate property.

They have the same issues as a private holder just maybe more volume.

if i'm wholesaling a property that is too far for me to drive to to show it, the prospective buyers that i am offering the property too might just sign with the deed holder, since the deed holder is showing them the property, what is to prevent them from not buying from me but working with the deed holder directly? 

I was under the impression that it was necessary for many tax benefits..now correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I've read in order to get tax benefits you need to put the real estate into the LLC, & to do that you can put it into a land trust in your own name that wouldn't trigger a transfer so wouldn't cause the bank to call your loan due, then mage the LLC the holder of that trust, which wouldn't be a transfer.now as protection you can start a corporation in a state like Wyoming, make someone else the manager & have them resign. have the LLC in your state (that's holding your trust) a member of the Wyoming corp. so the Wyoming corp owns the LLC that owns the trust. you can have multiple LLCs in the corp. now if someone sure they can only take what's in the individual LLCs.

It is a better coverage for the policy holder than "Actual Cash Value" (ACV).  

The Lender may enforce any of the provisions of this Note against any one or more of the Borrowers who sign this Note.The holder’s failure to exercise any right or option here under does not constitute a waiver of any future right or option.

Today i got off the phone with my rental insurance company and they told me I should really have the trust as the insurance holder rather then myself.

If the voucher holder or anyone over 18 in their household gets convicted of a felony or drug charge, they lose the privilege of having a voucher.

First of all you need to know as much as possible about the note holder (age, kids, financial situation, etc).  

@Jay Hinrichs well I'm asking for other possible properties I may want to go with a sub to on as wellso thanks for pointing out the lack of  land trust protection.this deal specifically isn't a seller carry because they owe how much its worth and the note holder is a local investor that doesn't want to foreclose. my intention was to wrap the financing with a slightly higher interest rate (currently 5%) maybe offer 6% to collect the difference and a small fee maybe $3,000 over the current amount owned. would people consider this seem unreasonable or a act of bad business for solving my sellers, her private lender, and a possible buyer who can't get traditional financing?