Then they'd search courthouse records, drive by, check the MLS and see how much BS the Montelongo's and A&E were shoveling that week.There were houses that were rehabbed on the show that the Montelongo's never owned, houses that supposedly sold on the show but not in real life, improvements and landscaping that were taken out after the show, and a woman that, if I recall correctly, was the mother-in-law one week and the open house buyer another week.All part of "reality shows", I suppose, but Armando made it part of his credibility kit, claiming huge numbers of successful rehab flips despite a lack of evidence in the real world.

I'd like see evidence that supports that.

Asking on BP if anyone has ever been sued and then using the lack of personal responses as evidence that it doesn't actually happen is flawed evidence.

They won't have to be tested right away but it is best to collect the evidence as close to the event as possible.

Twenty-four hours is presumed to be a reasonable notice in the absence of evidence to the contrary.(9) Promptly commence an action under Chapter 1923. of the Revised Code, after complying with division (C) of section 5321.17 of the Revised Code, to remove a tenant from particular residential premises, if the tenant fails to vacate the premises within three days after the giving of the notice required by that division and if the landlord has actual knowledge of or has reasonable cause to believe that the tenant, any person in the tenant's household, or any person on the premises with the consent of the tenant previously has or presently is engaged in a violation as described in division (A)(6)(a)(i) of section 1923.02 of the Revised Code, whether or not the tenant or other person has been charged with, has pleaded guilty to or been convicted of, or has been determined to be a delinquent child for an act that, if committed by an adult, would be a violation as described in that division.

I don't see any evidence that they have isolated "vacant" properties...P.S.

Remember, anyone can sue anyone for anything, so the existence of a lawsuit doesn't really provide much evidence.

Anecdotal evidence aside, could you refresh us as to:Your estimate of current value?

Then set up a security camera, and if they come back and break in, have them arrested for B&E, theft, DOP, etc.This assumes they have no evidence that they have any legal right to be there.

:) Bill Gulley, it's difficult to not take this as an attack, but I'm going to assume you aren't automatically calling me greedy.It's evident that you look at all hard money lending from the perspective of residential lending, based on credit scores, and consider hard money loans to be predatory.However, in my experience and within my network, all such loans are1.