As an Investment Consultant, we are currently seeing spiraling trends here with this company that is requiring investigation on behalf of our Company and our Clients we are representing.

Now if you intend to possibly keep the property and later instead decide to wholesale it, I don't see that as dishonest as things can change, but what you represent initially should be what your goal is going into the deal.Some people do advocate the "keeping the seller in the dark" approach, personally I don't feel it's the correct way to do business though legally there is nothing preventing you from doing so.

The community here is quite vast and the wealth of knowledge (and just flat-out wealth as well, now that I think about it) represented on this site is not only impressive, but extremely inspiring for an aspiring person in the realm of real estate, such as myself.Okay, so who am I?

I feel that if someone is ignorant enough to use an email that represents their lack of culture or civility I don't want them residing at my property

If the seller refuses you are happy to get an agent to represent you!

I have my license and I have not represented a customer in a sale of a property in years.

The market approach is the best indicator of sale prices and market value than the income approach and replacement value with depreciation.You'll find in the appraisal that all three approaches are taken and the best is selected that best represent the current market.

In order to represent 3rd party in a transaction you most certainly need a license.

Rezoning is costly but may be worth it to have a product (house) that is in demand but under-represented in your marketplace.

Shouldn't they represent sellers (even if it's the bank) and try to get the highest offer.