data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3928b/3928bbd56a103c53eb04febcd52667a79471e5e1" alt=""
4 October 2016 | 5 replies
. $300k (that I am not 100% sure about, it may be lower), but as a multi, the ARV could be approx. $350k- $375k (I am extremely confident on that, and could be higher) Overall, with that, the numbers will work.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21cb9/21cb9835a55132b7f5ef58193b858439a2393db3" alt=""
1 October 2016 | 6 replies
Here is what it says:"Upon any failure of Resident to occupy the Premises for the full term of a fixed term tenancy, for any reason other than as provided in ORS 90.453(2), 90.472 or 90.475, Owner/Agent may charge Resident either:---A)all of the following: i) all rent, unpaid fees and other non-rent charges accrued prior to the date that Owner/Agent knew or reasonably should have known of the abandonment or relinquishment of the Premises; ii) all damages relating to the condition of the Premises; iii) an early termination fee in an amount not to exceed one and one-half month's stated rent and which is due on the earlier of the date Resident gives notice to vacate or the date the Premises is vacated; iv) interest on the above amounts at the statutory rate from the date each was due, and v) all other amounts due at the times specified in this Rental Agreement; or prospective buyers or B) all actual damages resulting from the early termination, including but not limited to: i) repayment of concessions; all rent through the earlier date the Premises is re-rented and the lease termination date; ii) advertising and administrative costs to re-rent the Premises; iii) concessions given to re-rent the Premises; iv) the difference in rent if a lower rental rate is received from a replacement resident during the remaining term of the original Rental Agreement; v) damages related to the condition of the Premises, and iv) interest on all amounts at the statutory rate.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59cbc/59cbcdcaea1d673c0e77d1a01faf2d3a0f27e621" alt=""
18 January 2017 | 13 replies
In short, if you went to sell the note the price you get would be lower.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf87d/cf87d8b9a5fe7ed35558cc11c2bcd114afe4ea7f" alt=""
2 November 2016 | 17 replies
Tom Webber fire your listing agent and list it on the MLS for a small fee of $99 yourself and you would only need to compensate the buyers agent if they bring one and that would save you 3% possible 6% of the selling price which is able to lower your price to 3% less just to sell it right away.I'm my flip property I did it that way and it work like a charm.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/596b1/596b1f03ee3eddee3faf05102dd98d07c34e8b20" alt=""
2 October 2016 | 4 replies
Some may be higher and some lower, but I have found that generally speaking the formulas above have treated me well.
9 October 2016 | 15 replies
I was approve for a streamline refinance that allowed me to lower my rate without checking my credit score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ffa4/6ffa4013139c76afa131d756355d290605896153" alt=""
1 October 2016 | 1 reply
How are you all refinancing with a bank a a lower rate if you have other mortgages and you dti is maxed out by their models?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/661a0/661a06c22687f9f32a35101964487029c705a948" alt=""
7 October 2016 | 20 replies
Minneapolis has a much lower barrier/cost of entry into the market (not to mention I have a network in place in Minnesota).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5a8c/e5a8c4b2aa301f197a85ce44c9b9d51215575741" alt=""
26 October 2016 | 10 replies
We begin to see families utilizing a higher percentage of their income to buy homes which is odd considering we are lending at lower rates and P & I rising.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8da40/8da408141a651a6ed132a69dc7ca615394acd3f3" alt=""
4 October 2016 | 17 replies
@Waylon GatesFollowing are the similarities and differences between the solo 401k and the self-directed IRA.The Self-Directed IRA and Solo 401k Similarities Both were created by congress for individuals to save for retirement;Both may be invested in alternative investments such as real estate, precious metals tax liens, promissory notes, private company shares, and stocks and mutual funds, to name a few;Both allow for Roth contributions;Both are subject to prohibited transaction rules;Both are subject to federal taxes at time of distribution;Both allow for checkbook control for placing alternative investments;Both may be invested in annuities;Both are protected from creditors;Both allow for nondeductible contributions; andBoth are prohibited from investing in assets listed under I.R.C. 408(m) .The Self-Directed IRA and Solo 401k DifferencesIn order to open a solo 401k, self-employment, whether on a part-time or full-time basis, is required;To open a self-directed IRA, self-employment income is not required;In order to gain IRA checkbook control over the self-directed IRA funds, a limited liability company (IRA LLC) must be utilized;The solo 401k allows for checkbook control from the onset;The solo 401k allows for personal loan known as a solo 401k loan;It is prohibited to borrow from your IRA;The Solo 401k may be invested in life insurance;The self-directed IRA may not be invested in life insurance;The solo 401k allow for high contribution amounts (for 2016; the solo 401k contribution limit is $53,000, whereas the self-directed IRA contribution limit is $5,500);The solo 401k business owner can serve as trustee of the solo 401k;The self-directed IRA participant/owner may not serve as trustee or custodian of her IRA; instead, a trust company or bank institution is required;When distributions commence from the solo 401k a mandatory 20% of federal taxes must be withheld from each distribution and submitted electronically to the IRS by the 15th of the month following the date of each distribution;Rollovers and/or transfers from IRAs or qualified plans (e.g., former employer 401k) to a solo 401k are not reported on Form 5498, but rather on Form 5500-EZ, but only if the air market value of the solo 401k exceeds $250K as of the end of the plan year (generally 12/31);When funds are rolled over or transferred from an IRA or 401k to a self-directed IRA, the amount deposited into the self-directed IRA is reported on Form 5498 by the receiving self-directed IRA custodian by May of the year following the rollover/transfer.Rollovers (provided the 60 day rollover window is satisfied) from an IRA to a Solo 401k or self-directed IRA are reported on lines 15a and 15b of Form 1040;Pre-tax IRA contributions on reported on line 32 of Form 1040;Pre-tax solo 401k contributions are reported on line 28 of Form 1040;Roth solo 401k funds are subject to RMDs;A Roth 401k may be transferred to a Roth IRA (Note that from a planning perspective, it may be advantageous to transfer Roth Solo 401k funds to a Roth IRA before turning age 70 ½ in order to escape the Roth RMD requirement applicable to Roth 401k contributions including Roth Solo 401k contributions and earnings.)